We already clear the IRQ status register before processing IRQs, so do
not clear the register again. Especially do not clear the IRQ status
_after_ processing the IRQ as this way we can loose the event.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
---
 .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c   | 17 -----------------
 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
index 2437b0c7c073..28e9b0d448db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
@@ -120,21 +120,6 @@ static const struct dpu_intr_reg dpu_intr_set[] = {
 #define DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx)   (irq_idx / 32)
 #define DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx)  (BIT(irq_idx % 32))
 
-static void dpu_hw_intr_clear_intr_status_nolock(struct dpu_hw_intr *intr,
-               int irq_idx)
-{
-       int reg_idx;
-
-       if (!intr)
-               return;
-
-       reg_idx = DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx);
-       DPU_REG_WRITE(&intr->hw, dpu_intr_set[reg_idx].clr_off, 
DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx));
-
-       /* ensure register writes go through */
-       wmb();
-}
-
 /**
  * dpu_core_irq_callback_handler - dispatch core interrupts
  * @arg:               private data of callback handler
@@ -203,8 +188,6 @@ irqreturn_t dpu_core_irq(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms)
 
                        dpu_core_irq_callback_handler(dpu_kms, irq_idx);
 
-                       dpu_hw_intr_clear_intr_status_nolock(intr, irq_idx);
-
                        /*
                         * When callback finish, clear the irq_status
                         * with the matching mask. Once irq_status
-- 
2.30.2

Reply via email to