Hello Stephen,
Thanks again for the review comments


On 2021-07-20 22:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting maitreye (2021-07-20 15:39:30)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c
index be986da..316e8e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c
@@ -1036,43 +1036,46 @@ int dp_link_process_request(struct dp_link *dp_link)

        if (link->request.test_requested == DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ) {
                dp_link->sink_request |= DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
-               return ret;
+               goto out;
        }

        ret = dp_link_process_ds_port_status_change(link);
        if (!ret) {
                dp_link->sink_request |= DS_PORT_STATUS_CHANGED;
-               return ret;
+               goto out;
        }

        ret = dp_link_process_link_training_request(link);
        if (!ret) {
                dp_link->sink_request |= DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
-               return ret;
+               goto out;
        }

        ret = dp_link_process_phy_test_pattern_request(link);
        if (!ret) {
dp_link->sink_request |= DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
-               return ret;
+               goto out;
        }

        ret = dp_link_process_link_status_update(link);

if ret == 0 we go into the if below and goto out.

        if (!ret) {
                dp_link->sink_request |= DP_LINK_STATUS_UPDATED;
-               return ret;
+               goto out;
        }

At this point ret != 0 due to the goto above.


        if (dp_link_is_video_pattern_requested(link)) {
-               ret = 0;

And now we've removed the ret = 0 assignment from here.

                dp_link->sink_request |= DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
+               goto out;

And then we goto out. Isn't this a behavior change? Still feels like we
should be using if/else-if logic here instead of this goto maze.

        }

        if (dp_link_is_audio_pattern_requested(link)) {
                dp_link->sink_request |= DP_TEST_LINK_AUDIO_PATTERN;
-               return -EINVAL;
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+               goto out;
        }

+out:
+       DRM_DEBUG_DP("sink request=%#x", dp_link->sink_request);
        return ret;
 }


Thank you. I see what you are saying, and yes it makes sense, I'll change it to if else-if logic.

Reply via email to