On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:16:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> wrote:
We shouldn't be using debugfs_ namespace for this functionality. Rename
debugfs_gt.[ch] to intel_gt_debugfs.[ch] and then make functions,
defines and structs follow suit.
While at it and since we are renaming the header, sort the includes
alphabetically.
I didn't do a detailed review, maybe someone should, but superficially
seems good. On the series,
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
thanks. What about the question I raised on
intel_gt_register_debugfs() vs
intel_gt_debugfs_register()?
and
intel_gt_pm_register_debugfs() vs
intel_gt_pm_debugfs_register()?
what would be prefered here?
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
