On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:39 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 11/9/21 8:35 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> >> index 208a0ed840f4..195dcbff7058 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> >> @@ -188,6 +188,12 @@
> >> clock-output-names = "clk_ext4";
> >> };
> >>
> >> + mipi_phy: mipi-video-phy {
> >> + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-video-phy";
> >> + syscon = <&disp_blk_ctrl>;
> >> + #phy-cells = <1>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> psci {
> >> compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> >> method = "smc";
> >> @@ -1068,6 +1074,68 @@
> >> #size-cells = <1>;
> >> ranges = <0x32c00000 0x32c00000 0x400000>;
> >>
> >> + lcdif: lcdif@32e00000 {
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-lcdif",
> >> "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif";
> >
> > The compatible "imx6sx-lcdif" implies MXSFB_V6. FWICT, it is like
> > MXSFB_V4, but with overlays and those overlays have more registers
> > configured in the mxsfb_kms driver. Have you tried using imx28-lcdif
> > to see if it makes a difference?
>
> Indeed, MX6SX has AS overlay plane support, MX{2,}8 does not.
>
> LCDIFv3 (as NXP calls it) in MX8MP is like LCDIFv6 (in MX6SX) with
> slightly reordered register bits, but nothing like LCDIF rev3 (in MX23)
> ... just to make sure there is no confusion.
>
> [...]
>
> >> + mipi_dsi: mipi_dsi@32e10000 {
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim";
> >> + reg = <0x32e10000 0x400>;
> >> + clocks = <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_DSI_CORE>,
> >> + <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_DSI_PHY_REF>;
> >> + clock-names = "bus_clk", "sclk_mipi";
> >> + assigned-clocks = <&clk
> >> IMX8MM_CLK_DSI_CORE>,
> >> + <&clk
> >> IMX8MM_VIDEO_PLL1_OUT>,
> >> + <&clk
> >> IMX8MM_CLK_DSI_PHY_REF>;
> >> + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk
> >> IMX8MM_SYS_PLL1_266M>,
> >> + <&clk
> >> IMX8MM_VIDEO_PLL1_BYPASS>,
> >> + <&clk
> >> IMX8MM_VIDEO_PLL1_OUT>;
> >> + assigned-clock-rates = <266000000>,
> >> <594000000>, <27000000>;
> >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 18
> >> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> + phys = <&mipi_phy 0>;
> >> + phy-names = "dsim";
> >> + power-domains = <&disp_blk_ctrl
> >> IMX8MM_DISPBLK_PD_MIPI_DSI>;
> >> + samsung,burst-clock-frequency =
> >> <891000000>;
> >> + samsung,esc-clock-frequency = <54000000>;
> >> + samsung,pll-clock-frequency = <27000000>;
>
> This 27 MHz is really IMX8MM_CLK_DSI_PHY_REF and
> samsung,burst-clock-frequency is really the DSI link clock which is
> panel/bridge specific ... but, why do we need to specify such policy in
> DT rather than have the panel/bridge drivers negotiate the best clock
> settings with DSIM bridge driver ? This should be something which should
> be implemented in the DRM subsystem, not hard-coded in DT. These ad-hoc
> samsung,*-clock-frequency properties shouldn't even be needed then.
>
> Also, are the DSIM bindings stable now ?
Thanks Marek.
No, there is no dsim driver yet. I'm not clear if there is still
dissagreement on if the drm/exynos driver can be split up or if a
whole new somewhat duplicate driver needs to be made. I know Jagan
also has a series he is working on that uses drm/exynos which I
believe he will share an update on in a day or so.
I'm still using the work that Michael [1] and you [2] did a long time back.
I had this solution working on a 5.10 kernel but it was based on the
old unapproved IMX8MM blk-ctl and pd drivers. Therefore I believe the
issue I'm having is something not setup correctly with blk-ctl per my
dt settings or perhaps something missing from the blk-ctl driver like
Adam found [3]
I am hanging at:
[ 1.064088] imx_pgc_power_up gpumix
[ 1.077506] imx_pgc_power_down gpumix
[ 1.097685] imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_on dispblk-mipi-dsi
[ 1.102682] imx_pgc_power_up dispmix
[ 1.106825] imx_pgc_power_up mipi
[ 1.110232] imx-dsim-dsi 32e10000.mipi_dsi: supply vddcore not
found, using dummy regulator
[ 1.118760] imx-dsim-dsi 32e10000.mipi_dsi: supply vddio not found,
using dummy regulator
[ 1.127361] imx-dsim-dsi 32e10000.mipi_dsi: [drm] *ERROR* modalias
failure on /soc@0/bus@32c00000/mipi_dsi@32e10000/port@0
[ 1.138676] imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_off dispblk-mipi-dsi
[ 1.143788] imx_pgc_power_down mipi
[ 1.145278] imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_on dispblk-lcdif
[ 1.147316] imx_pgc_power_down dispmix
[ 1.155804] imx_pgc_power_up dispmix
[ 1.159820] [drm:drm_bridge_attach] *ERROR* failed to attach bridge
/soc@0/bus@32c00000/mipi_dsi@32e10000 to encoder None-34: -517
^^^ this is just a defer
[ 1.171789] imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_off dispblk-lcdif
[ 1.176655] imx_pgc_power_down dispmix
[ 1.181790] libphy: fec_enet_mii_bus: probed
[ 3.915806] panel-simple panel: Expected bpc in {6,8} but got: 0
^^^ not sure what this is but had it back in my 5.10 solution as well
so did not investigate
[ 3.921912] imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_on dispblk-mipi-dsi
[ 3.926936] imx_pgc_power_up dispmix
[ 3.931109] imx_pgc_power_up mipi
[ 3.935409] imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_on dispblk-lcdif
[ 3.940547] imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_off dispblk-lcdif
[ 3.945626] [drm] Initialized mxsfb-drm 1.0.0 20160824 for
32e00000.lcdif on minor 0
^^^ not clear why dispblk-lcdif got disabled here
Best regards,
Tim
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/list/?series=347439&archive=both&state=*
[2]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=359775&archive=both&state=*
[3]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20211106155427.753197-1-aford...@gmail.com/
