24.11.2021 10:18, Akhil R пишет: >> *i2c_dev) >>> i2c_dev->is_vi = true; >>> } >> How are you going to differentiate the VI I2C from a non-VI? This doesn't >> look >> right. > This patch adds the ACPI support to only non-VI I2C. The device_ids in match > table > are added accordingly. I suppose, of_device_is_compatible always returns > false as > there is no device tree. > Agree with the other comments.
Will the VI I2C have a different ACPI ID or how it's going to work?
