On 2021-12-03 at 12:24:20 +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> If this is LMEM then we get a 32 entry PT, with each PTE pointing to
> some 64K block of memory, otherwise it's just the usual 512 entry PT.
> This very much assumes the caller knows what they are doing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
> index bd3ca0996a23..312b2267bf87 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
> @@ -728,13 +728,56 @@ static void gen8_ppgtt_insert_entry(struct
> i915_address_space *vm,
> gen8_pdp_for_page_index(vm, idx);
> struct i915_page_directory *pd =
> i915_pd_entry(pdp, gen8_pd_index(idx, 2));
> + struct i915_page_table *pt = i915_pt_entry(pd, gen8_pd_index(idx, 1));
> gen8_pte_t *vaddr;
>
> - vaddr = px_vaddr(i915_pt_entry(pd, gen8_pd_index(idx, 1)));
> + GEM_BUG_ON(pt->is_compact);
Do we have compact PT for smem with 64k pages?
> +
> + vaddr = px_vaddr(pt);
> vaddr[gen8_pd_index(idx, 0)] = gen8_pte_encode(addr, level, flags);
> clflush_cache_range(&vaddr[gen8_pd_index(idx, 0)], sizeof(*vaddr));
> }
>
> +static void __xehpsdv_ppgtt_insert_entry_lm(struct i915_address_space *vm,
> + dma_addr_t addr,
> + u64 offset,
> + enum i915_cache_level level,
> + u32 flags)
> +{
> + u64 idx = offset >> GEN8_PTE_SHIFT;
> + struct i915_page_directory * const pdp =
> + gen8_pdp_for_page_index(vm, idx);
> + struct i915_page_directory *pd =
> + i915_pd_entry(pdp, gen8_pd_index(idx, 2));
> + struct i915_page_table *pt = i915_pt_entry(pd, gen8_pd_index(idx, 1));
> + gen8_pte_t *vaddr;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, SZ_64K));
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(offset, SZ_64K));
> +
> + if (!pt->is_compact) {
> + vaddr = px_vaddr(pd);
> + vaddr[gen8_pd_index(idx, 1)] |= GEN12_PDE_64K;
> + pt->is_compact = true;
> + }
> +
> + vaddr = px_vaddr(pt);
> + vaddr[gen8_pd_index(idx, 0) / 16] = gen8_pte_encode(addr, level, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void xehpsdv_ppgtt_insert_entry(struct i915_address_space *vm,
> + dma_addr_t addr,
> + u64 offset,
> + enum i915_cache_level level,
> + u32 flags)
> +{
> + if (flags & PTE_LM)
> + return __xehpsdv_ppgtt_insert_entry_lm(vm, addr, offset,
> + level, flags);
> +
> + return gen8_ppgtt_insert_entry(vm, addr, offset, level, flags);
Matt,
Is this call for gen8_*** is for insertion of smem PTE entries on the
64K capable platforms like DG2?
Ram
> +}
> +
> static int gen8_init_scratch(struct i915_address_space *vm)
> {
> u32 pte_flags;
> @@ -937,7 +980,10 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen8_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt,
>
> ppgtt->vm.bind_async_flags = I915_VMA_LOCAL_BIND;
> ppgtt->vm.insert_entries = gen8_ppgtt_insert;
> - ppgtt->vm.insert_page = gen8_ppgtt_insert_entry;
> + if (HAS_64K_PAGES(gt->i915))
> + ppgtt->vm.insert_page = xehpsdv_ppgtt_insert_entry;
> + else
> + ppgtt->vm.insert_page = gen8_ppgtt_insert_entry;
> ppgtt->vm.allocate_va_range = gen8_ppgtt_alloc;
> ppgtt->vm.clear_range = gen8_ppgtt_clear;
> ppgtt->vm.foreach = gen8_ppgtt_foreach;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
