Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-01-06 18:01:27)
> Currently DP driver will allocate panel bridge for eDP panels.
> Simplify this code to just check if there is any next bridge in the
> chain (be it a panel bridge or regular bridge). Rename panel_bridge
> field to next_bridge accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
I like this one, it certainly makes it easier to understand.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c
> index a7acc23f742b..5de21f3d0812 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c
> @@ -307,11 +299,9 @@ static int dp_parser_parse(struct dp_parser *parser, int
> connector_type)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> - if (connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
It feels like this is on purpose, but I don't see any comment so I have
no idea. I think qcom folks are concerned about changing how not eDP
works. I'll have to test it out locally.
> - rc = dp_parser_find_panel(parser);
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> - }
> + rc = dp_parser_find_next_bridge(parser);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
>
> /* Map the corresponding regulator information according to
> * version. Currently, since we only have one supported platform,
