On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 09:36:02AM +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 10:50 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:21:54AM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogan...@intel.com>
>
> Currently ICL_PHY_MISC macro is returning offset 0x64C10 for PHY_E
> port. Correct offset is 0x64C14.

Why is it PHY_E and not PHY_F?

This is a valid question. It seems we have followed intel_phy_is_snps()
here:

// snip
else if (IS_DG2(dev_priv))
                /*
                 * All four "combo" ports and the TC1 port (PHY E) use
                 * Synopsis PHYs.
                 */
                return phy <= PHY_E;
// snip

And this is actually the bug that we had. We wouldn't need to bring the
incomplete support for the 5th port if this single had changed:  it's
often preferred to prepare the driver first and enable the port/phy as
the last step:

-               return phy <= PHY_E;
+               return phy <= PHY_D;

With possibly a change in the commit above. Because in
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c we do:

intel_snps_phy_wait_for_calibration()
{
...
        for_each_phy_masked(phy, ~0) {
                if (!intel_phy_is_snps(i915, phy))
                        continue;
...
}

Relying on intel_phy_is_snps() to mask out the unavailable phys.

However, since now we almost have the extra port wired up, I'm not going
to push back on it. Let's just add a comment on the commit message.
And since going with this approach is also acked by Ville who preferred
to contain the additional mapping inside intel_phy_snps.c:

Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>

Lucas De Marchi



According to spec port E is "No connection". Better place to fix this
could be intel_phy_is_snps() itself?


> Fix this by handling PHY_E port seprately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogan...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h               | 6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> index c60575cb5368..f08061c748b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void intel_snps_phy_wait_for_calibration(struct
> drm_i915_private *i915)
>            if (!intel_phy_is_snps(i915, phy))
>                    continue;
>
> -          if (intel_de_wait_for_clear(i915, ICL_PHY_MISC(phy),
> +          if (intel_de_wait_for_clear(i915, DG2_PHY_MISC(phy),
>                                        DG2_PHY_DP_TX_ACK_MASK,
> 25))
>                    drm_err(&i915->drm, "SNPS PHY %c failed to
> calibrate after 25ms.\n",
>                            phy);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 4d12abb2d7ff..354c25f483cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -9559,8 +9559,10 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>
>  #define _ICL_PHY_MISC_A           0x64C00
>  #define _ICL_PHY_MISC_B           0x64C04
> -#define ICL_PHY_MISC(port)        _MMIO_PORT(port, _ICL_PHY_MISC_A, \
> -                                           _ICL_PHY_MISC_B)
> +#define _DG2_PHY_MISC_TC1 0x64C14 /* TC1="PHY E" but offset as if
> "PHY F" */
> +#define ICL_PHY_MISC(port)        _MMIO_PORT(port, _ICL_PHY_MISC_A,
> _ICL_PHY_MISC_B)
> +#define DG2_PHY_MISC(port)        ((port) == PHY_E ?
> _MMIO(_DG2_PHY_MISC_TC1) : \
> +                           ICL_PHY_MISC(port))
>  #define  ICL_PHY_MISC_MUX_DDID                    (1 << 28)
>  #define  ICL_PHY_MISC_DE_IO_COMP_PWR_DOWN (1 << 23)
>  #define  DG2_PHY_DP_TX_ACK_MASK                   REG_GENMASK(23,
> 20)
> --
> 2.20.1

BR,

Jouni Högander

Reply via email to