On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:15:42PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
Xe_HP removed "slice" as a first-class unit in the hardware design.
Instead we now have a single pool of subslices (which are now referred
to as "DSS") that different hardware units have different ways of
grouping ("compute slices," "geometry slices," etc.). For the purposes
of topology representation, we treat Xe_HP-based platforms as having a
single slice that contains all of the platform's DSS. There's no need
to allocate storage space for (max legacy slices * max dss); let's
update some of our macros to minimize the storage requirement for sseu
topology. We'll also document some of the constants to make it a little
bit more clear what they represent.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h | 47 +++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
index 4fbf45a74ec0..f9e246004bc0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ intel_engine_has_relative_mmio(const struct intel_engine_cs
* const engine)
#define for_each_instdone_gslice_dss_xehp(dev_priv_, sseu_, iter_, gslice_,
dss_) \
for ((iter_) = 0, (gslice_) = 0, (dss_) = 0; \
- (iter_) < GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES; \
+ (iter_) < GEN_SS_MASK_SIZE; \
(iter_)++, (gslice_) = (iter_) / GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE, \
(dss_) = (iter_) % GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE) \
for_each_if(intel_sseu_has_subslice((sseu_), 0, (iter_)))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
index 8a79cd8eaab4..4f59eadbb61a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
@@ -15,26 +15,49 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
struct intel_gt;
struct drm_printer;
-#define GEN_MAX_SLICES (3) /* SKL upper bound */
-#define GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES (32) /* XEHPSDV upper bound */
-#define GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(max_entries) DIV_ROUND_UP(max_entries, BITS_PER_BYTE)
-#define GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES)
-#define GEN_MAX_EUS (16) /* TGL upper bound */
-#define GEN_MAX_EU_STRIDE GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(GEN_MAX_EUS)
+/*
+ * Maximum number of legacy slices. Legacy slices no longer exist starting on
+ * Xe_HP ("gslices," "cslices," etc. on Xe_HP and beyond are a different
+ * concept and are not expressed through fusing).
+ */
+#define GEN_MAX_LEGACY_SLICES 3
+
+/*
+ * Maximum number of subslices that can exist within a legacy slice. This is
+ * only relevant to pre-Xe_HP platforms (Xe_HP and beyond use the GEN_MAX_DSS
+ * value below).
+ */
+#define GEN_MAX_LEGACY_SUBSLICES 6
instead of calling the old legacy, maybe just add the XEHP_ prefix to
the new ones?
+
+/* Maximum number of DSS on newer platforms (Xe_HP and beyond). */
+#define GEN_MAX_DSS 32
+
+/* Maximum number of EUs that can exist within a subslice or DSS. */
+#define GEN_MAX_EUS_PER_SS 16
+
+#define MAX(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b))
what's worse, include kernel.h in another header file or redefine MAX
everywhere? Re-defining it in headers we risk situations in which the
include order may create warnings about defining it in multiple places.
+
+/* The maximum number of bits needed to express each subslice/DSS
independently */
+#define GEN_SS_MASK_SIZE MAX(GEN_MAX_DSS, \
+ GEN_MAX_LEGACY_SLICES *
GEN_MAX_LEGACY_SUBSLICES)
+
+#define GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(max_entries) DIV_ROUND_UP(max_entries, BITS_PER_BYTE)
+#define GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE
GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(GEN_SS_MASK_SIZE)
+#define GEN_MAX_EU_STRIDE GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(GEN_MAX_EUS_PER_SS)
#define GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE 4
#define GEN_DSS_PER_CSLICE 8
#define GEN_DSS_PER_MSLICE 8
-#define GEN_MAX_GSLICES (GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES / GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE)
-#define GEN_MAX_CSLICES (GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES / GEN_DSS_PER_CSLICE)
+#define GEN_MAX_GSLICES (GEN_MAX_DSS / GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE)
+#define GEN_MAX_CSLICES (GEN_MAX_DSS / GEN_DSS_PER_CSLICE)
struct sseu_dev_info {
u8 slice_mask;
- u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
- u8 geometry_subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
- u8 compute_subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
- u8 eu_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES * GEN_MAX_EU_STRIDE];
+ u8 subslice_mask[GEN_SS_MASK_SIZE];
+ u8 geometry_subslice_mask[GEN_SS_MASK_SIZE];
+ u8 compute_subslice_mask[GEN_SS_MASK_SIZE];
+ u8 eu_mask[GEN_SS_MASK_SIZE * GEN_MAX_EU_STRIDE];
Aside the minor things above, everything look correct.
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
u16 eu_total;
u8 eu_per_subslice;
u8 min_eu_in_pool;
--
2.34.1
