On Tue 29 Mar 06:27 PDT 2022, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:

> While bridge/panel detection was initially relying on the usual
> port/ports-based of graph detection, it was recently changed to
> perform the lookup on any child node that is not port/ports
> instead when such a node is available, with no fallback on the
> usual way.
> 
> This results in breaking detection when a child node is present
> but does not contain any panel or bridge node, even when the
> usual port/ports-based of graph is there.
> 
> In order to support both situations properly, this commit reworks
> the logic to try both options and not just one of the two: it will
> only return -EPROBE_DEFER when both have failed.
> 

Thanks for your patch Paul, it fixed a regression on a device where I
have a eDP bridge with an of_graph and a aux-bus defined.

But unfortunately it does not resolve the regression I have for the
USB based DisplayPort setup described below.


In the Qualcomm DisplayPort driver We're calling:

        devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);

and with the following DT snippet the behavior changed:

displayport-controller@ae90000 {
        compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-dp";
        ...

        operating-points-v2 = <&dp0_opp_table>;

        ports {
                #address-cells = <1>;
                #size-cells = <0>;

                port@0 {
                        reg = <0>;
                        dp0_in: endpoint {
                                remote-endpoint = <&display_driver>;
                        };
                };
        };

        dp0_opp_table: opp-table {
                ...;
        };
};

Prior to the introduction of 80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child
node has panel or bridge") this would return -ENODEV, so we could
differentiate the case when we have a statically defined eDP panel from
that of a dynamically attached (over USB) DP panel.

Prior to your change, above case without the opp-table node would have
still returned -ENODEV.

But now this will just return -EPROBE_DEFER in both cases.


I thought the appropriate method of referencing the dsi panel was to
actually reference that using the of_graph, even though it's a child of
the dsi controller - that's at least how we've done it in e.g. [1].
I find this to be much nicer than to just blindly define that all
children of any sort of display controller must be a bridge or a panel.

[1] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts#n436

Regards,
Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkow...@bootlin.com>
> Fixes: 80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child node has panel or bridge")
> ---
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - Removed unnecessary else statement and added a comment about
>   clearing the panel pointer on error.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Renamed remote to node;
> - Renamed helper to find_panel_or_bridge;
> - Cleared bridge pointer early;
> - Returned early to make the code more concise;
> 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> index 9d90cd75c457..8716da6369a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,29 @@ int drm_of_encoder_active_endpoint(struct device_node 
> *node,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_of_encoder_active_endpoint);
>  
> +static int find_panel_or_bridge(struct device_node *node,
> +                             struct drm_panel **panel,
> +                             struct drm_bridge **bridge)
> +{
> +     if (panel) {
> +             *panel = of_drm_find_panel(node);
> +             if (!IS_ERR(*panel))
> +                     return 0;
> +
> +             /* Clear the panel pointer in case of error. */
> +             *panel = NULL;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* No panel found yet, check for a bridge next. */
> +     if (bridge) {
> +             *bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(node);
> +             if (*bridge)
> +                     return 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge - return connected panel or bridge device
>   * @np: device tree node containing encoder output ports
> @@ -241,66 +264,44 @@ int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct 
> device_node *np,
>                               struct drm_panel **panel,
>                               struct drm_bridge **bridge)
>  {
> -     int ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -     struct device_node *remote;
> +     struct device_node *node;
> +     int ret;
>  
>       if (!panel && !bridge)
>               return -EINVAL;
> +
>       if (panel)
>               *panel = NULL;
> -
> -     /**
> -      * Devices can also be child nodes when we also control that device
> -      * through the upstream device (ie, MIPI-DCS for a MIPI-DSI device).
> -      *
> -      * Lookup for a child node of the given parent that isn't either port
> -      * or ports.
> -      */
> -     for_each_available_child_of_node(np, remote) {
> -             if (of_node_name_eq(remote, "port") ||
> -                 of_node_name_eq(remote, "ports"))
> -                     continue;
> -
> -             goto of_find_panel_or_bridge;
> +     if (bridge)
> +             *bridge = NULL;
> +
> +     /* Check for a graph on the device node first. */
> +     if (of_graph_is_present(np)) {
> +             node = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint);
> +             if (node) {
> +                     ret = find_panel_or_bridge(node, panel, bridge);
> +                     of_node_put(node);
> +
> +                     if (!ret)
> +                             return 0;
> +             }
>       }
>  
> -     /*
> -      * of_graph_get_remote_node() produces a noisy error message if port
> -      * node isn't found and the absence of the port is a legit case here,
> -      * so at first we silently check whether graph presents in the
> -      * device-tree node.
> -      */
> -     if (!of_graph_is_present(np))
> -             return -ENODEV;
> -
> -     remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint);
> -
> -of_find_panel_or_bridge:
> -     if (!remote)
> -             return -ENODEV;
> +     /* Otherwise check for any child node other than port/ports. */
> +     for_each_available_child_of_node(np, node) {
> +             if (of_node_name_eq(node, "port") ||
> +                 of_node_name_eq(node, "ports"))
> +                     continue;
>  
> -     if (panel) {
> -             *panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote);
> -             if (!IS_ERR(*panel))
> -                     ret = 0;
> -             else
> -                     *panel = NULL;
> -     }
> -
> -     /* No panel found yet, check for a bridge next. */
> -     if (bridge) {
> -             if (ret) {
> -                     *bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
> -                     if (*bridge)
> -                             ret = 0;
> -             } else {
> -                     *bridge = NULL;
> -             }
> +             ret = find_panel_or_bridge(node, panel, bridge);
> +             of_node_put(node);
>  
> +             /* Stop at the first found occurrence. */
> +             if (!ret)
> +                     return 0;
>       }
>  
> -     of_node_put(remote);
> -     return ret;
> +     return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge);
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

Reply via email to