On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 01:10:09PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> We have an iterator for this, use it. It does include the base block,
> but its tag is 0 and will be skipped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index efc1999b9573..dcef92c8887a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -2574,6 +2574,8 @@ vtb_for_each_detailed_block(const u8 *ext, detailed_cb 
> *cb, void *closure)
>  static void
>  drm_for_each_detailed_block(const struct edid *edid, detailed_cb *cb, void 
> *closure)
>  {
> +     struct drm_edid_iter edid_iter;
> +     const u8 *ext;
>       int i;
>  
>       if (edid == NULL)
> @@ -2582,9 +2584,8 @@ drm_for_each_detailed_block(const struct edid *edid, 
> detailed_cb *cb, void *clos
>       for (i = 0; i < EDID_DETAILED_TIMINGS; i++)
>               cb(&(edid->detailed_timings[i]), closure);
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < edid_extension_block_count(edid); i++) {
> -             const u8 *ext = edid_extension_block_data(edid, i);
> -
> +     drm_edid_iter_begin(edid, &edid_iter);
> +     drm_edid_iter_for_each(ext, &edid_iter) {
>               switch (*ext) {
>               case CEA_EXT:
>                       cea_for_each_detailed_block(ext, cb, closure);
> @@ -2596,6 +2597,7 @@ drm_for_each_detailed_block(const struct edid *edid, 
> detailed_cb *cb, void *clos
>                       break;
>               }
>       }
> +     drm_edid_iter_end(&edid_iter);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -- 
> 2.30.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to