On 16/05/2022 03:59, Neal Liu wrote: >>> Okay, I could rename it for next patch if you preferred. >>> But there are lots of yaml files which are not named as first compatible. >> >> Yes, I know, I quite likely I also produced such bindings, but a specific >> name is >> rather preferred. Otherwise you will have a difficult naming choice when your >> next Aspeed UDC requires new bindings file because of some differences (not >> yet known now). >> > We can rename the bindings if next Aspeed UDC needs, don't you think? > Currently, Aspeed has no requirement.
So just use proper name from the beginning.... Best regards, Krzysztof
