I got the list as follow:
 ~/linux-kernel/linux-next  on master ⇡1  ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 
0001-drm-display-Remove-duplicate-the-in-two-places.patch
David Airlie <[email protected]&gt; (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS)
Daniel Vetter <[email protected]&gt; (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS)
Jani Nikula <[email protected]&gt; 
(commit_signer:8/21=38%,authored:5/21=24%)
Lyude Paul <[email protected]&gt; (commit_signer:7/21=33%,authored:2/21=10%)
Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]&gt; 
(commit_signer:5/21=24%,authored:5/21=24%)
Douglas Anderson <[email protected]&gt; 
(commit_signer:5/21=24%,authored:3/21=14%)
"Ville Syrjälä" <[email protected]&gt; (commit_signer:5/21=24%)
Imre Deak <[email protected]&gt; (authored:2/21=10%)
[email protected] (open list:DRM DRIVERS)
[email protected] (open list)


Submit patch CMD as follow:
"git send-email 0001-drm-display-Remove-duplicate-the-in-two-places.patch --to 
[email protected],[email protected] --cc 
[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]
 "



&nbsp;
------------------&nbsp;Original&nbsp;------------------
From: &nbsp;"蒋健"<[email protected]&gt;;
Date: &nbsp;Wed, Jun 22, 2022 02:47 AM
To: &nbsp;"Lyude Paul"<[email protected]&gt;; "airlied"<[email protected]&gt;; 
"daniel"<[email protected]&gt;; 
Cc: &nbsp;"jani.nikula"<[email protected]&gt;; 
"ville.syrjala"<[email protected]&gt;; 
"tzimmermann"<[email protected]&gt;; "dianders"<[email protected]&gt;; 
"imre.deak"<[email protected]&gt;; 
"dri-devel"<[email protected]&gt;; 
Subject: &nbsp;Re: [PATCH] drm/display: drop unexpected word "the" in the 
comments

&nbsp;

Okay,I will submit a new patch immediately.
 
发自我的企业微信&nbsp;


        ----------Reply to Message----------
        On Wed,Jun 22,2022 2:41 AM Lyude Paul <[email protected]&gt; wrote:
                        You can send it by adding email addresses to git 
send-email with the "--to [email protected]" argument. If it doesn't come up on 
patchwork the second try don't worry about it, I'll look and see if I can 
workaround it. TBH I'm not entirely sure why it didn't show up in the first 
place


On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 02:38 +0800, 蒋健 wrote:
I need resubmit a new patch, &nbsp;how can i make sure dri-devel@ &nbsp;is 
explicitly?I got to:list by the script
&nbsp;name of get_maintainer.pl.
Pls help me…

发自我的企业微信&nbsp;



----------Reply to Message----------
On Wed,Jun 22,2022 2:07 AM Lyude Paul <[email protected]&gt; wrote:
Actually I hate to ask but could you resend this and the other patch that you
sent and make sure that dri-devel@ is explicitly in the to: list? For some
reason these patches don't seem to be coming up on patchwork

On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 13:54 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
&gt; Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]&gt;
&gt; 
&gt; Will push to the appropriate branch in a moment
&gt; 
&gt; On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 21:14 +0800, Jiang Jian wrote:
&gt; &gt; there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be 
dropped
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; file: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
&gt; &gt; line: 1600
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes 
each
&gt; &gt; changed to
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <[email protected]&gt;
&gt; &gt; ---
&gt; &gt;&nbsp; drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
&gt; &gt;&nbsp; 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
&gt; &gt; b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
&gt; &gt; index e7c22c2ca90c..499f75768523 100644
&gt; &gt; --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
&gt; &gt; +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
&gt; &gt; @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static int drm_dp_aux_reply_duration(const 
struct
&gt; &gt; drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; * Calculate the length of the i2c transfer in usec, 
assuming
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; * the i2c bus speed is as specified. Gives the the "worst"
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; * case estimate, ie. successful while as long as possible.
&gt; &gt; - * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
&gt; &gt; + * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; * message includes a START, ADDRESS and STOP. Neither 
does it
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; * account for additional random variables such as clock 
stretching.
&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; */
&gt; 

-- 
Cheers,
&nbsp;Lyude Paul (she/her)
&nbsp;Software Engineer at Red Hat






-- 

Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat

Reply via email to