On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:25:19AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:18:01AM +0200, José Expósito wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > Thanks for looking into the patches.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 09:36:45AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 09:15:31AM +0200, José Expósito wrote:
> > > > Extend the existing test cases to test the conversion from XRGB8888 to
> > > > grayscale.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairaca...@riseup.net>
> > > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <david...@google.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposit...@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c
> > > > index 09d358b54da0..71722e828abe 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c
> > > > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ struct convert_to_xrgb2101010_result {
> > > > const u32 expected[TEST_BUF_SIZE];
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +struct convert_to_gray8_result {
> > > > + unsigned int dst_pitch;
> > > > + const u8 expected[TEST_BUF_SIZE];
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > static struct kunit_case drm_format_helper_test_cases[] = {
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb332,
> > > > convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb565,
> > > > convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb888_test,
> > > > convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_xrgb2101010_test,
> > > > convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_gray8_test,
> > > > convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > >
> > > The trailing test feels redundant,
> >
> > Why do you feel like it is redundant? Under the hood, most conversion
> > functions reuse the same code, but the *_line() function is unique and
> > I think that it is worth testing it.
>
> Sure, I wasn't commenting on the code itself, but the trailing "test" in
> the test name: drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_gray8_test
> ^
>
> Which is redundant since we already have "test" in the prefix.
>
> Maxime
Ah! OK, I misunderstood your first sentence. Indeed, the _test sufix
should be removed, added to my TODO list.
Thanks!!
