Hello Roman, On 2023-05-09 at 13:04:50 +0200, "Roman Beranek" <m...@crly.cz> wrote: > On Mon May 8, 2023 at 10:47 AM CEST, Frank Oltmanns wrote: >> I played back a 60 fps video (10 seconds) and recorded the panel's >> output with a 240 fps camera. I noticed only 2 dropped frames, that I >> account to the imperfect data rate of 107.8MHz instead of 108 MHz due >> to pll-video0's rate being 294MHz instead of the 297 MHz for reasons >> I described in the thread on your v2 of this patch [4]). > > Yes. That's what should happen, right? Or do you report this as a > defect?
Sorry, I didn't communicate more clearly. Without your patch, I'm losing a number of frames in the realm of three digits. With your patch I only lost 2 frames which is expetcted. Your patches are a big improvement. This is the opposite of a defect report. :-) Thanks, Frank > > Roman
