On 13/05/2023 12:12, Anup Sharma wrote:
There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to module_platform_driver() helper function.Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle semantic patch as: drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c:1957:6-11: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it. No functional changes are intended. Signed-off-by: Anup Sharma <anupnewsm...@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c index e0a402a85787..10dc3315e69e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c @@ -1954,7 +1954,6 @@ static struct platform_driver samsung_dsim_driver = { .remove = samsung_dsim_remove, .driver = { .name = "samsung-dsim", - .owner = THIS_MODULE, .pm = &samsung_dsim_pm_ops, .of_match_table = samsung_dsim_of_match, },
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstr...@linaro.org>
