Hi,

On 2023/7/17 18:07, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 23.06.2023 um 18:08 +0800 schrieb Sui Jingfeng:
From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingf...@loongson.cn>

This make the code in etnaviv_pdev_probe() less twisted, drop the reference
to device node after finished. Also kill a double blank line.

I can't spot the double blank line you claim to remove.

Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingf...@loongson.cn>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c
index 7d0eeab3e8b7..3446f8eabf59 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c
@@ -27,6 +27,19 @@
   * DRM operations:
   */
+/* If the DT contains at least one available GPU, return a pointer to it */
+

Here is the double blank line my patch remove, it (a blank line) is occupied by
the comment of "/* If the DT contains at least one available GPU, return a pointer 
to it */"


I think the code in the function is simple enough that we don't need a
comment explaining what it does.

Ok, then I'll remove the comment at the next version. Thanks


Regards,
Lucas

+static struct device_node *etnaviv_of_first_node(void)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+
+       for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "vivante,gc") {
+               if (of_device_is_available(np))
+                       return np;
+       }
+
+       return NULL;
+}
static void load_gpu(struct drm_device *dev)
  {
@@ -587,7 +600,7 @@ static const struct component_master_ops etnaviv_master_ops 
= {
  static int etnaviv_pdev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
        struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-       struct device_node *first_node = NULL;
+       struct device_node *first_node;
        struct component_match *match = NULL;
if (!dev->platform_data) {
@@ -597,11 +610,10 @@ static int etnaviv_pdev_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                        if (!of_device_is_available(core_node))
                                continue;
- if (!first_node)
-                               first_node = core_node;
-
                        drm_of_component_match_add(&pdev->dev, &match,
                                                   component_compare_of, 
core_node);
+
+                       of_node_put(core_node);
                }
        } else {
                char **names = dev->platform_data;
@@ -634,8 +646,11 @@ static int etnaviv_pdev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
         * device as the GPU we found. This assumes that all Vivante
         * GPUs in the system share the same DMA constraints.
         */
-       if (first_node)
+       first_node = etnaviv_of_first_node();
+       if (first_node) {
                of_dma_configure(&pdev->dev, first_node, true);
+               of_node_put(first_node);
+       }
return component_master_add_with_match(dev, &etnaviv_master_ops, match);
  }
@@ -709,17 +724,14 @@ static int __init etnaviv_init(void)
         * If the DT contains at least one available GPU device, instantiate
         * the DRM platform device.
         */
-       for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "vivante,gc") {
-               if (!of_device_is_available(np))
-                       continue;
+       np = etnaviv_of_first_node();
+       if (np) {
                of_node_put(np);
ret = etnaviv_create_platform_device("etnaviv",
                                                     &etnaviv_platform_device);
                if (ret)
                        goto unregister_platform_driver;
-
-               break;
        }
return 0;

Reply via email to