Hi, On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:10 AM Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No. Please, do not remove the I2C ID table. It had already been > > discussed a few years ago. > > > > > Yes, it make sense, as it saves some memory > > Okay, reading code a bit, it seems that it won't work with purely i2c > ID matching.
OK, so you are in agreement that it would be OK to drop the I2C ID table? > So the question here is "Do we want to allow enumeration via sysfs or not?" Is there some pressing need for it? If not, I guess I'd tend to wait until someone needs this support before adding it. -Doug
