On 14/09/2023 23:38, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> The current implementation will try to pick the highest available size
> display unit as soon as the BO size exceeds that of the previous
> multiplier. That can lead to loss of precision in contexts of low memory
> usage.
>
> The new selection criteria try to preserve precision, whilst also
> increasing the display unit selection threshold to render more accurate
> values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.laru...@collabora.com>
I have to admit I find it odd to be "pretty printing" this value in the
first place. But this is clearly an improvement.
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.pr...@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> index 762965e3d503..34cfa128ffe5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> @@ -872,6 +872,8 @@ void drm_send_event(struct drm_device *dev, struct
> drm_pending_event *e)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_send_event);
>
> +#define UPPER_UNIT_THRESHOLD 100
> +
> static void print_size(struct drm_printer *p, const char *stat,
> const char *region, u64 sz)
> {
> @@ -879,7 +881,8 @@ static void print_size(struct drm_printer *p, const char
> *stat,
> unsigned u;
>
> for (u = 0; u < ARRAY_SIZE(units) - 1; u++) {
> - if (sz < SZ_1K)
> + if ((sz & (SZ_1K - 1)) &&
> + sz < UPPER_UNIT_THRESHOLD * SZ_1K)
> break;
> sz = div_u64(sz, SZ_1K);
> }
