On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:26:42AM +0200, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Andrzej asked me to try to revert commits 0b62af28f249, e0b72c14d8dc and 
> 1e0877d58b1e, and reverting those fixed the i915 crash for me. The 
> e0b72c14d8dc and 1e0877d58b1e commits look like just prerequisites, so I 
> assume 0b62af28f249 ("i915: convert shmem_sg_free_table() to use a 
> folio_batch") is the culprit here.
> 
> Could you please check this?
> 
> Our conversation with Andrzej is available at drm-intel GitLab [1].
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9256

Wow, that is some great debugging.  Thanks for all the time & effort
you and others have invested.  Sorry for breaking your system.

You're almost right about the "prerequisites", but it's in the other
direction; 0b62af28f249 is a prerequisite for the later two cleanups,
so reverting all three is necessary to test 0b62af28f249.

It seems to me that you've isolated the problem to constructing overly
long sg lists.  I didn't realise that was going to be a problem, so
that's my fault.

Could I ask you to try this patch?  I'll follow up with another patch
later because I think I made another assumption that may not be valid.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c
index 8f1633c3fb93..73a4a4eb29e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ int shmem_sg_alloc_table(struct drm_i915_private *i915, 
struct sg_table *st,
        st->nents = 0;
        for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
                struct folio *folio;
+               unsigned long nr_pages;
                const unsigned int shrink[] = {
                        I915_SHRINK_BOUND | I915_SHRINK_UNBOUND,
                        0,
@@ -150,6 +151,8 @@ int shmem_sg_alloc_table(struct drm_i915_private *i915, 
struct sg_table *st,
                        }
                } while (1);
 
+               nr_pages = min_t(unsigned long,
+                               folio_nr_pages(folio), page_count - i);
                if (!i ||
                    sg->length >= max_segment ||
                    folio_pfn(folio) != next_pfn) {
@@ -157,13 +160,13 @@ int shmem_sg_alloc_table(struct drm_i915_private *i915, 
struct sg_table *st,
                                sg = sg_next(sg);
 
                        st->nents++;
-                       sg_set_folio(sg, folio, folio_size(folio), 0);
+                       sg_set_folio(sg, folio, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE, 0);
                } else {
                        /* XXX: could overflow? */
-                       sg->length += folio_size(folio);
+                       sg->length += nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
                }
-               next_pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio);
-               i += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
+               next_pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + nr_pages;
+               i += nr_pages - 1;
 
                /* Check that the i965g/gm workaround works. */
                GEM_BUG_ON(gfp & __GFP_DMA32 && next_pfn >= 0x00100000UL);

Reply via email to