Hi Jani,
> >> struct i915_vma *vma, *next;
> >> unsigned long freed_pages = 0;
> >> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> >> + struct intel_gt *gt;
> >> + int i;
> >
> > the trend is to use 'unsigned int' here and I've seen it
> > reviewed. Personally, if I really have to express a preference, I
> > prefer 'int' because it's a bit safer, generally I don't really
> > mind :)
>
> Always use int over unsigned int if you don't have a specific reason not
> to. ("It can't be negative" is not a good reason.)
Finally someone! I totally agree!
Andi
