Hi Andy,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes linus/master v6.6 
next-20231103]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/drm-i915-dsi-assume-BXT-gpio-works-for-non-native-GPIO/20231103-064642
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
patch link:    
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102151228.668842-15-andriy.shevchenko%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 14/15] drm/i915/dsi: Replace poking of CHV GPIOs 
behind the driver's back
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231104/202311040312.tf6btkw0-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 
ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231104/202311040312.tf6btkw0-...@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
| Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311040312.tf6btkw0-...@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:272:4: error: call to 
>> undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support 
>> implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                           soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:03", "Panel SE",
                           ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:275:4: error: call to 
undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support 
implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                           soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:00", "Panel SW",
                           ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:278:4: error: call to 
undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support 
implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                           soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:02", "Panel E",
                           ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:281:4: error: call to 
undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support 
implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                           soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:01", "Panel N",
                           ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:299:3: error: call to 
undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support 
implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                   soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:01", 
"Panel N",
                   ^
   5 errors generated.


vim +/soc_exec_opaque_gpio +272 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c

   263  
   264  static void chv_gpio_set_value(struct intel_connector *connector,
   265                                 u8 gpio_source, u8 gpio_index, bool 
value)
   266  {
   267          struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = 
to_i915(connector->base.dev);
   268  
   269          if (connector->panel.vbt.dsi.seq_version >= 3) {
   270                  if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SE) {
   271                          /* XXX: it's unclear whether 255->57 is part of 
SE. */
 > 272                          soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
 > "INT33FF:03", "Panel SE",
   273                                               gpio_index - 
CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW, value);
   274                  } else if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW) {
   275                          soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:00", "Panel SW",
   276                                               gpio_index - 
CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW, value);
   277                  } else if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E) {
   278                          soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:02", "Panel E",
   279                                               gpio_index - 
CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E, value);
   280                  } else {
   281                          soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:01", "Panel N",
   282                                               gpio_index - 
CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_N, value);
   283                  }
   284          } else {
   285                  /* XXX: The spec is unclear about CHV GPIO on seq v2 */
   286                  if (gpio_source != 0) {
   287                          drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
   288                                      "unknown gpio source %u\n", 
gpio_source);
   289                          return;
   290                  }
   291  
   292                  if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E) {
   293                          drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
   294                                      "invalid gpio index %u for GPIO 
N\n",
   295                                      gpio_index);
   296                          return;
   297                  }
   298  
   299                  soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, 
"INT33FF:01", "Panel N",
   300                                       gpio_index - CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_N, 
value);
   301          }
   302  }
   303  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Reply via email to