Hello Laurent, On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:39:55AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 06:54:27PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > pm_runtime_resume_and_get() already drops the runtime PM usage counter > > in the error case. So a call to pm_runtime_put_sync() can be dropped. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de> > > I wonder if checkpatch should warn about usage of pm_runtime_get_sync().
It should not warn in general. There are cases where
pm_runtime_get_sync() is the right function to use. See for example
commit aec488051633 ("crypto: stm32 - Properly handle pm_runtime_get
failing").
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
