Hi Greg,

Thanks for your inputs and patience in reviewing the patch.
By mistakenly this internal patch has been sent for review as the reference 
commit ID is from opensource, email has been sent to those who are all involved 
in that commit.
Please ignore this patch as it is for internal usage.

Thanks and Regards

Kolanupaka Naveena
Graphics Software Engineer | GSE OSGC
M +918374415216
Intel Corporation | intel.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 9:46 PM
> To: Kolanupaka Naveena <kolanupaka.nave...@intel.com>
> Cc: gfx-internal-de...@eclists.intel.com; Wilson, Chris P
> <chris.p.wil...@intel.com>; Siddiqui, Ayaz A <ayaz.siddi...@intel.com>;
> Muqthyar Ahmed, Syed Abdul <syed.abdul.muqthyar.ah...@intel.com>;
> Sagar Chormale <sagar.chorm...@intel.com>; Pan, Xinhui
> <xinhui....@amd.com>; David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>; Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>; Maxime Ripard <mrip...@kernel.org>;
> Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mche...@kernel.org>; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Daniel Vetter
> <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>; Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Arnd
> Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>; Sumit Semwal <sumit.sem...@linaro.org>;
> Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/46] dma-buf: move dma-buf symbols into the
> DMA_BUF module namespace.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:01:47PM +0530, Kolanupaka Naveena wrote:
> > +#ifdef BPM_MODULE_IMPORT_NS_SUPPORT
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#endif
> 
> No #ifdef in .c files please, this should not be an issue, just include the 
> .h file.
> 
> >  #include <drm/intel_iaf_platform.h>
> >
> >  #include "gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.h"
> > @@ -23,6 +26,10 @@
> >  #include "i915_trace.h"
> >  #include "intel_iaf.h"
> >
> > +#ifdef BPM_MODULE_IMPORT_NS_SUPPORT
> > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF);
> > +#endif
> 
> Why is a #ifdef needed here?  If this isn't built as a module, it's not an 
> issue,
> please just make it simpler.
> 
> But really, why is this a #define at all in the first place?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Reply via email to