On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com> wrote:
> size given in resource is the exact size (not size - 1)
>

NAK, the vtx resource size is size minus 1.  See the accel code in the
ddx and the code in r600 driver in mesa.

Alex

> Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
> ---
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c | ? ?2 +-
> ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
> index d886494..487a765 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
> @@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ static int r600_packet3_check(struct radeon_cs_parser 
> *p,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -EINVAL;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?offset = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx+1+(i*7)+0);
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? size = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx+1+(i*7)+1) 
> + 1;
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? size = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx+1+(i*7)+1);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (p->rdev && (size + offset) > 
> radeon_bo_size(reloc->robj)) {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* force size to size of the buffer */
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?dev_warn(p->dev, "vbo resource seems 
> too big (%d) for the bo (%ld)\n",
> --
> 1.7.0.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

Reply via email to