Prefer the EDID iterators over drm_edid_find_extension() in
drm_edid_has_cta_extension(), even if this leads to more code. The key
is to use the same patterns as much as possible.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index 6a31a3af20dd..02f0a5fd819a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -4171,11 +4171,21 @@ static bool drm_edid_has_cta_extension(const struct 
drm_edid *drm_edid)
 {
        const struct displayid_block *block;
        struct displayid_iter iter;
-       int ext_index = 0;
+       struct drm_edid_iter edid_iter;
+       const u8 *ext;
        bool found = false;
 
        /* Look for a top level CEA extension block */
-       if (drm_edid_find_extension(drm_edid, CEA_EXT, &ext_index))
+       drm_edid_iter_begin(drm_edid, &edid_iter);
+       drm_edid_iter_for_each(ext, &edid_iter) {
+               if (ext[0] == CEA_EXT) {
+                       found = true;
+                       break;
+               }
+       }
+       drm_edid_iter_end(&edid_iter);
+
+       if (found)
                return true;
 
        /* CEA blocks can also be found embedded in a DisplayID block */
-- 
2.39.2

Reply via email to