On 4/5/2024 11:15 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 20:35, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com> wrote:
On 3/9/2024 7:09 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Currently the MSM DSI driver looks for the next bridge during
msm_dsi_modeset_init(). If the bridge is not registered at that point,
this might result in -EPROBE_DEFER, which can be problematic that late
during the device probe process. Move next bridge acquisition to the
dsi_bind state so that probe deferral is returned as early as possible.
But msm_dsi_modeset)init() is also called during msm_drm_bind() only.
What issue are you suggesting will be fixed by moving this from
msm_drm_bind() to dsi_bind()?
The goal is to return as early as possible as not not cause
probe-deferral loops. See commit fbc35b45f9f6 ("Add documentation on
meaning of -EPROBE_DEFER"). It discusses returning from probe() but
the same logic applies to bind().
Understood. I was trying to make sure the purpose of the patch is that
"deferral in component_bind() is better than component_master_bind()"
But yes, overall that is better since the unbounding path will be more
in the master case.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c | 8 +-------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com>
