On 23/04/2024 12:44, Sui Jingfeng wrote: >>>> If you need platform one, for some reason, explain >>>> what is your matching path and add appropriate ID table. With that >>>> explanation, of course. >>> When tfp410 works as a transparent bridge. The device itself is just a >>> platform device. >>> similar with the display-connector.c and simple-bridge.c. >>> >>> It is not discoverable by the system on non-DT environment, this is the >>> root problem. >>> I said the various display bridges drivers are fully DT dependent, Dimtry >>> didn't agree! >>> >>> He said "I can not agree here. It doesn't depend on DT." and then asks me >>> to developing >>> some other solution witch could preserve code sharing. So here it is. >> >> You wrote long message without actually reading my answer early. I >> already gave you the solution. Address that one. > > Use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() instead? OK, I understand then. Thanks a lot > for the education.
Yes, at least for something which is real driver. Best regards, Krzysztof
