On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:16:42PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:03:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:10:10AM +0530, Devarsh Thakkar wrote: > > > Use generic macro round_closest_up for rounding to nearest multiple > > > instead > > > > round_closest_up() > > > > We refer to the functions as func(). > > > > > of using local function.
... > > > @@ -565,7 +563,7 @@ static void find_best_seam(struct > > > ipu_image_convert_ctx *ctx, > > > * The closest input sample position that we could actually > > > * start the input tile at, 19.13 fixed point. > > > */ > > > - in_pos_aligned = round_closest(in_pos, 8192U * in_align); > > > + in_pos_aligned = round_closest_up(in_pos, 8192U * in_align); > > > /* Convert 19.13 fixed point to integer */ > > > in_pos_rounded = in_pos_aligned / 8192U; > > > > Oh, these seems to be better to use either ALIGN*(), or PFN_*() / PAGE_*() > > families of macros. What the semantic of 8192 is? > > The comment mentions 19.13 fixed point, so I assume that's the > fractional part of the integer. It doesn't seem related to pages. Okay, and align word in all those variable names? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
