Hi,

On 5/21/24 15:57, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
+static int mtk_drm_of_ddp_path_build(struct device *dev, struct device_node 
*node,
+                                    struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data *data)
+{
+       struct device_node *ep_node;
+       struct of_endpoint of_ep;
+       bool output_present[MAX_CRTC] = { false };
+       int ret;
+
+       for_each_endpoint_of_node(node, ep_node) {
+               ret = of_graph_parse_endpoint(ep_node, &of_ep);
+               of_node_put(ep_node);

There is going to *double* decline the reference counter, as the __of_get_next_child() will decrease the reference counter for us
on the next iteration.


+               if (ret) {
+                       dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Cannot parse endpoint\n");
+                       break;
+               }

Move the 'of_node_put(ep_node)' into brace '{}' here, if we really cares
about the reference count.

+
+               if (of_ep.id >= MAX_CRTC) {

ditto ?

+                       ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
+                                           "Invalid endpoint%u number\n", 
of_ep.port);
+                       break;
+               }
+
+               output_present[of_ep.id] = true;
+       }
+
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       if (output_present[CRTC_MAIN]) {
+               ret = mtk_drm_of_ddp_path_build_one(dev, CRTC_MAIN,
+                                                   &data->main_path, 
&data->main_len);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       if (output_present[CRTC_EXT]) {
+               ret = mtk_drm_of_ddp_path_build_one(dev, CRTC_EXT,
+                                                   &data->ext_path, 
&data->ext_len);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       if (output_present[CRTC_THIRD]) {
+               ret = mtk_drm_of_ddp_path_build_one(dev, CRTC_THIRD,
+                                                   &data->third_path, 
&data->third_len);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+

--
Best regards
Sui Jingfeng

Reply via email to