On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 09:26:48AM +1200, Ryan Walklin wrote: > On Sat, 25 May 2024, at 7:10 AM, Conor Dooley wrote: > > Thanks for the review! > > >> + > >> +properties: > >> + compatible: > >> + const: wl-355608-a8 > > > > You're missing a vendor prefix here. And when you add it, update the > > filename to match. > > Thanks, I don't actually know the vendor, would it be acceptable to just use > "wl"?
You mean, "wl,355608-a8"? I did a wee bit of googling of the thing, and yeah, there's nothing that a surface level search turns up for it - other than they appeared to have a logo with a W in a circle... I think if we genuinely do not know what the vendor is then we just don't have a prefix. > >> + compatible = "wl_355608_a8"; > > > > This doesn't match what you documented, be sure to run dt_binding_check. > > Thanks, changed underscore to dash mid-patch and neglected to fix all > the examples (and the subsequent code patch it seems. Will correct. > Is there a preference one way or another? Not _s :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
