On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 02:22:23PM GMT, Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho wrote:
> Introduce a test to cover the creation of framebuffer with
> modifier on a device that doesn't support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcar...@disroot.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - Reorder kunit cases alphabetically.
> v3:
> - Replace the use of void pointer on drm_framebuffer_test_priv struct.
> - Test return value of drm_internal_framebuffer_create().
> - Change test documentation to don't rely on another test.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
> index 4b1884be9d7a..22966ebfe9cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
> @@ -415,8 +415,33 @@ static void drm_framebuffer_test_to_desc(const struct
> drm_framebuffer_test *t, c
> KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(drm_framebuffer_create, drm_framebuffer_create_cases,
> drm_framebuffer_test_to_desc);
>
> +/* Tries to create a framebuffer with modifiers without drm_device
> supporting it */
> +static void drm_test_framebuffer_modifiers_not_supported(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct drm_framebuffer_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> + struct drm_device *dev = &priv->dev;
> + struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> +
> + /* A valid cmd with modifier */
> + struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 cmd = {
> + .width = MAX_WIDTH, .height = MAX_HEIGHT,
> + .pixel_format = DRM_FORMAT_ABGR8888, .handles = { 1, 0, 0 },
> + .offsets = { UINT_MAX / 2, 0, 0 }, .pitches = { 4 * MAX_WIDTH,
> 0, 0 },
> + .flags = DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
> + };
> +
> + priv->buffer_created = false;
> + dev->mode_config.fb_modifiers_not_supported = 1;
> +
> + fb = drm_internal_framebuffer_create(dev, &cmd, NULL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, priv->buffer_created);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, IS_ERR(fb), true);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, PTR_ERR(fb), -EINVAL);I'd rather have the actual and expected values always in the same order, preferably the former first. Also, is there a reason you assert that it's an error, and then expect the error code? You can remove the assertion, it's already covered by the expectation. Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
