Hello Martin,

On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 11:12:55AM +0200, Martin Kepplinger-Novaković wrote:
> This makes debugging often easier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger-Novaković 
> <martin.kepplinger-novako...@ginzinger.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c 
> b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index f1005bd0c41e3..cc7e7af71891f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>                                                 GPIOD_ASIS);
>       if (IS_ERR(pb->enable_gpio)) {
>               ret = dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(pb->enable_gpio),
> -                                 "failed to acquire enable GPIO\n");
> +                                 "failed to acquire enable GPIO: %ld\n",
> +                                 PTR_ERR(pb->enable_gpio));

AFAIK dev_err_probe already emits the error code passed as 2nd
parameter. So I wonder about this patch's benefit.

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to