On 27/06/10 16:20, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:51:40 +1200 > Michael Cree<mcree at orcon.net.nz> wrote: > >>>> Is this a regression (what kernel version worked)? >>>> >>>> Seems that the IOMMU can't find 128 pages. It's likely due to: >>>> >>>> - out of the IOMMU space (possibly someone doesn't free the IOMMU >>>> space). >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> - the mapping parameters (such as align) aren't appropriate so the >>>> IOMMU can't find space. >>> >>> I don't think KMS drivers have ever worked on alpha so its not a >>> regression, they are working fine on x86 + powerpc and sparc has been >>> run at least once. >> >> KMS on the console boot up has worked since about 2.6.32, but starting >> up the X server has always failed and, in my case, the system becomes >> unstable and eventually OOPs. >> >>> I suspect we are simply hitting the limits of the iommu, how big an >>> address space does it handle? since generally graphics drivers try to >>> bind a lot of things to the GART. >> >> No idea on the address space limit. I applied the patch of Fujita that >> logs all IOMMU allocations, and also inserted some extra printks in the >> ttm kernel code so that I could see which routines failed and the error >> code returned. Running the radeon test on boot exhibits the following: >> >> [ 238.712768] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset >> 0x1a312000 >> [ 239.281127] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset >> 0x1a412000 >> [ 239.281127] ttm_tt_bind belched -12 >> [ 239.282104] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem belched -12 >> [ 239.282104] ttm_bo_move_buffer belched -12 >> [ 239.282104] ttm_bo_validate belched -12 >> [ 239.282104] radeon 0000:01:00.0: object_init failed for (1048576, >> 0x00000002) err=-12 >> [ 239.282104] [drm:radeon_test_moves] *ERROR* Failed to create GTT >> object 419 >> [ 239.399291] Error while testing BO move. >> >> Note that no IOMMU allocations are printed while radeon_test_moves is >> running so iommu_arena_alloc doesn't appear to be called. Also the >> error code returned up to radeon_test_moves is -12 which is ENOMEM. So >> does appear to be some memory limit. > > Hmm, not related with IOMMU? looks like ttm_tt_populate could return > ENOMEM too. Can we locate where we hit ENOMEM first?
Yeah, in ttm_mem_global_reserve while it is walking glob->zones: [ 239.303588] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset 0x1a412000 [ 239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds limit (0x1a5ef000) [ 239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds limit (0x1a5ef000) [ 239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds limit (0x1a5ef000) [ 239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds limit (0x1a5ef000) [ 239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve zone used_mem (0x1a5f0000) exceeds limit (0x1a5ef000) [ 239.304564] ttm_mem_global_reserve return non-zero count decs to zero [ 239.304564] ttm_mem_global_alloc_page belched -12 [ 239.304564] __ttm_tt_get_page coughed NULL [ 239.304564] ttm_tt_populate belched -12 [ 239.304564] ttm_tt_bind belched -12 [ 239.304564] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem belched -12 [ 239.304564] ttm_bo_move_buffer belched -12 [ 239.304564] ttm_bo_validate belched -12 On a hunch that we are chasing a red herring I installed another 256MB of memory into the machine (was 576MB for the test reported above) for a total of 832MB. Now radeon_test_moves runs to completion without error. OK, now a test of starting up the X server - ah, a bus error again but now it looks like it's in the radeon driver: [ 1435.014] (II) EXA(0): Driver allocated offscreen pixmaps [ 1435.014] (II) EXA(0): Driver registered support for the following operations: [ 1435.014] (II) Solid [ 1435.014] (II) Copy [ 1435.014] (II) Composite (RENDER acceleration) [ 1435.014] (II) UploadToScreen [ 1435.014] (II) DownloadFromScreen [ 1435.030] Backtrace: [ 1435.032] 0: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x54) [0x120070884] [ 1435.032] 1: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (0x120000000+0x65608) [0x120065608] [ 1435.033] 2: /lib/libc.so.6.1 (0x20000310000+0x3d610) [0x2000034d610] [ 1435.034] 3: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (0x20000758000+0x15b890) [0x200008b3890] [ 1435.034] 4: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (0x20000758000+0x1392a0) [0x200008912a0] [ 1435.034] 5: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (0x20000758000+0x139bec) [0x20000891bec] [ 1435.034] 6: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (0x20000758000+0x4f088) [0x200007a7088] [ 1435.035] 7: /opt/xorg-ev56/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (0x20000758000+0x16f0f8) [0x200008c70f8] [ 1435.035] 8: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (AddScreen+0x1c0) [0x1200532b0] [ 1435.036] 9: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (InitOutput+0x29c) [0x12008c6ec] [ 1435.036] 10: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (0x120000000+0x24b48) [0x120024b48] [ 1435.037] 11: /lib/libc.so.6.1 (__libc_start_main+0xec) [0x2000033267c] [ 1435.037] 12: /opt/xorg-ev56/bin/X (__start+0x38) [0x120024788] [ 1435.038] Bus error at address 0x20000030000 And nothing in dmesg. Now I'm not triggering the nasty page alloc errors. Cheers Michael.