On 2024-10-23 23:50, Kasireddy, Vivek wrote:
>> I'd echo many of Bjorn's concerns. In addition, I think the name of the
>> pci_devs_are_p2pdma_compatible() isn't quite right. Specifically this is
>> dealing with PCI functions within a single device that are known to
>> allow P2P traffic. So I think the name should probably reflect that.
> Would pci_devfns_support_p2pdma() be a more appropriate name?

That sounds better to me, thanks.

Logan

Reply via email to