On Sat 2024-11-16 11:10:52, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 15/11/2024 à 22:26, Easwar Hariharan a écrit : > > [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de eahar...@linux.microsoft.com. > > Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à > > https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > > > Changes made with the following Coccinelle rules: > > > > @@ constant C; @@ > > > > - msecs_to_jiffies(C * 1000) > > + secs_to_jiffies(C) > > > > @@ constant C; @@ > > > > - msecs_to_jiffies(C * MSEC_PER_SEC) > > + secs_to_jiffies(C) > > > > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahar...@linux.microsoft.com> > > --- > > samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c | 2 +- > > samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c | 2 +- > > samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c | 10 +++++----- > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c > > b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c > > index > > 378e2d40271a9717d09eff51d3d3612c679736fc..d0fd801a7c21b7d7939c29d83f9d993badcc9aba > > 100644 > > --- a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c > > +++ b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c > > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int livepatch_callbacks_mod_init(void) > > { > > pr_info("%s\n", __func__); > > schedule_delayed_work(&work, > > - msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * 0)); > > + secs_to_jiffies(0)); > > Using secs_to_jiffies() is pointless, 0 is universal, should become > schedule_delayed_work(&work, 0);
Yes, schedule_delayed_work(&work, 0) looks like the right solution. Or even better, it seems that the delayed work might get replaced by a normal workqueue work. Anyway, I am working on a patchset which would remove this sample module. There is no need to put much effort into the clean up of this particular module. Do whatever is easiest for you. Best Regards, Petr
