On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:52:10AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote: > > On 8 Apr 2025, at 2:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:17:13PM +0530, Aditya Garg wrote: > >> The vsprint patch was originally being sent as a seperate patch [1], and > >> I was waiting it to be taken up. But as suggested by Petr, I'm sending > >> them via DRM. > > > > You need to do something about your tools, really. > > Uhh, I'll just revert to the tried and tested macOS mail. > > Although I don't think a resend is necessary here now.
I dunno. If people are using `b4`, it might mess up the patch ordering, I haven't checked this myself (it depends if it takes [PATCH x/y] or message threading into account first). It seems not a big deal with _this_ series, but for the future it may be really a problem (esp. from [runtime] bisectability point of view). > > Now it's patch 3 threaded to patch 1, while the rest, including cover > > letter, > > seems okay. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
