Ping......
At 2025-04-22 15:59:27, "Andy Yan" <andys...@163.com> wrote: > >Hi all, > >At 2025-03-21 17:48:04, "Maxime Ripard" <mrip...@kernel.org> wrote: >>On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 04:53:38PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote: >>> From: Andy Yan <andy....@rock-chips.com> >>> >>> In some application scenarios, we hope to get the corresponding >>> connector when the bridge's detect hook is invoked. >>> >>> In most cases, we can get the connector by >>> drm_atomic_get_connector_for_encoder >>> if the encoder attached to the bridge is enabled, however there will >>> still be some scenarios where the detect hook of the bridge is called >>> but the corresponding encoder has not been enabled yet. For instance, >>> this occurs when the device is hot plug in for the first time. >>> >>> Since the call to bridge's detect is initiated by the connector, passing >>> down the corresponding connector directly will make things simpler. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy....@rock-chips.com> >> >>FTR, I'm against it and would have appreciated that you wait for a >>meaningful closure to the discussion we've had on this. > >Can we start to review this patch? Since it's been almost a month now and >no one has raised any objection to Dmitry's suggestion[1]. > > >[1]https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/vw2ncdomx3rwltb2xlo6nf3rapgcdtcjcodofgmecrzzabf7ji@pybsfv27jkq2/ > > >> >>Maxime
