On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 02:49:55PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-04-25 at 11:20 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > Currently the job free work item will lock sched->job_list_lock first
> > time
> > to see if there are any jobs, free a single job, and then lock again
> > to
> > decide whether to re-queue itself if there are more finished jobs.
> > 
> > Since drm_sched_get_finished_job() already looks at the second job in
> > the
> > queue we can simply add the signaled check and have it return the
> > presence
> > of more jobs to free to the caller. That way the work item does not
> > have
> > to lock the list again and repeat the signaled check.
> 
> Are you convinced that this is worth it?
> 
> I'm torn. It's rare that one returns a status through a boolean by
> reference.
> 

I'd say no to this (mirco optimization) and to freeing / running more
than job per worker invocation. The later was rejected in original work
queue conversion.

Matt

> 
> Independently from that, this is a candidate which certainly can be
> branched out from this series, to make the series completely about the
> new scheduling policy, not general other improvements.
> 
> 
> P.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@igalia.com>
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> > Cc: Danilo Krummrich <d...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Philipp Stanner <pha...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 39 +++++++++++-------------
> > --
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > index 86e40157b09b..a45b02fd2af3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > @@ -365,22 +365,6 @@ static void __drm_sched_run_free_queue(struct
> > drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >             queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_free_job);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/**
> > - * drm_sched_run_free_queue - enqueue free-job work if ready
> > - * @sched: scheduler instance
> > - */
> > -static void drm_sched_run_free_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
> > *sched)
> > -{
> > -   struct drm_sched_job *job;
> > -
> > -   spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> > -   job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
> > -                                  struct drm_sched_job, list);
> > -   if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
> > -           __drm_sched_run_free_queue(sched);
> > -   spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> > -}
> > -
> >  /**
> >   * drm_sched_job_done - complete a job
> >   * @s_job: pointer to the job which is done
> > @@ -1097,12 +1081,13 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct
> > drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >   * drm_sched_get_finished_job - fetch the next finished job to be
> > destroyed
> >   *
> >   * @sched: scheduler instance
> > + * @have_more: are there more finished jobs on the list
> >   *
> >   * Returns the next finished job from the pending list (if there is
> > one)
> >   * ready for it to be destroyed.
> >   */
> >  static struct drm_sched_job *
> > -drm_sched_get_finished_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> > +drm_sched_get_finished_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, bool
> > *have_more)
> >  {
> >     struct drm_sched_job *job, *next;
> >  
> > @@ -1110,22 +1095,27 @@ drm_sched_get_finished_job(struct
> > drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >  
> >     job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
> >                                    struct drm_sched_job, list);
> > -
> >     if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished)) {
> >             /* remove job from pending_list */
> >             list_del_init(&job->list);
> >  
> >             /* cancel this job's TO timer */
> >             cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr);
> > -           /* make the scheduled timestamp more accurate */
> > +
> > +           *have_more = false;
> >             next = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched-
> > >pending_list,
> >                                             typeof(*next),
> > list);
> > -
> >             if (next) {
> > +                   /* make the scheduled timestamp more
> > accurate */
> >                     if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
> >                                  &next->s_fence-
> > >scheduled.flags))
> >                             next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
> >                                     dma_fence_timestamp(&job-
> > >s_fence->finished);
> > +
> > +                   if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
> > +                                &next->s_fence-
> > >finished.flags))
> > +                           *have_more = true;
> > +
> >                     /* start TO timer for next job */
> >                     drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
> >             }
> > @@ -1184,12 +1174,15 @@ static void drm_sched_free_job_work(struct
> > work_struct *w)
> >     struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
> >             container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler,
> > work_free_job);
> >     struct drm_sched_job *job;
> > +   bool have_more;
> >  
> > -   job = drm_sched_get_finished_job(sched);
> > -   if (job)
> > +   job = drm_sched_get_finished_job(sched, &have_more);
> > +   if (job) {
> >             sched->ops->free_job(job);
> > +           if (have_more)
> > +                   __drm_sched_run_free_queue(sched);
> > +   }
> >  
> > -   drm_sched_run_free_queue(sched);
> >     drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
> >  }
> >  
> 

Reply via email to