On 2025-05-20 12:31 pm, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 07:48:39AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 7:33 AM Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> wrote:

On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:53:19AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>

In situations where mapping/unmapping sequence can be controlled by
userspace, attempting to map over a region that has not yet been
unmapped is an error.  But not something that should spam dmesg.

Now that there is a quirk, we can also drop the selftest_running
flag, and use the quirk instead for selftests.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
---
  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
  include/linux/io-pgtable.h     |  8 ++++++++
  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

[...]

diff --git a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
index bba2a51c87d2..639b8f4fb87d 100644
--- a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
@@ -88,6 +88,13 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
        *
        * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD: Enables dirty tracking in stage 1 pagetable.
        * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB: Use the FWB format for the MemAttrs bits
+      *
+      * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON: Do not WARN_ON() on conflicting
+      *      mappings, but silently return -EEXISTS.  Normally an attempt
+      *      to map over an existing mapping would indicate some sort of
+      *      kernel bug, which would justify the WARN_ON().  But for GPU
+      *      drivers, this could be under control of userspace.  Which
+      *      deserves an error return, but not to spam dmesg.
        */
       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_NS                 BIT(0)
       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_PERMS               BIT(1)
@@ -97,6 +104,7 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_OUTER_WBWA         BIT(6)
       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD                 BIT(7)
       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB              BIT(8)
+     #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON             BIT(9)

This feels a bit fragile to me:
   * IOMMU-API users of io-pgtable shouldn't be passing this quirk
     but might end up doing so to paper over driver bugs.

   * Low-level users of io-pgtable who expose page-table operations to
     userspace need to pass the quirk, but might well not bother because
     well-behaved userspace doesn't trigger the warning.

So overall, it's all a bit unsatisfactory. Is there a way we could have
the warnings only when invoked via the IOMMU API?

iommu drivers _not_ setting this flag seems like a good way to achieve that ;-)

The alternative is to move the warns to the iommu driver... but they
could just as easily remove the WARN_ON()s as they could set the
NO_WARN_ON quirk, so :shrug:?

Bah, I also don't have a good idea to improve this, so I guess I'll take
what you have for now.

Hmm, just a nit on reflection, how about fixing up the name to just IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN? Given that it's already quite long, and we have a well-established DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN with equivalent semantics over in the DMA API.

Cheers,
Robin.

Reply via email to