On 20/05/2025 22:06, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:13:26PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Driver unconditionally saves current state on first init in >> dsi_pll_10nm_init(), but does not save the VCO rate, only some of the >> divider registers. The state is then restored during probe/enable via >> msm_dsi_phy_enable() -> msm_dsi_phy_pll_restore_state() -> >> dsi_10nm_pll_restore_state(). >> >> Restoring calls dsi_pll_10nm_vco_set_rate() with >> pll_10nm->vco_current_rate=0, which basically overwrites existing rate of >> VCO and messes with clock hierarchy, by setting frequency to 0 to clock >> tree. This makes anyway little sense - VCO rate was not saved, so >> should not be restored. >> >> If PLL was not configured configure it to minimum rate to avoid glitches >> and configuring entire in clock hierarchy to 0 Hz. >> >> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@oss.qualcomm.com> >> Link: >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/sz4kbwy5nwsebgf64ia7uq4ee7wbsa5uy3xmlqwcstsbntzcov@ew3dcyjdzmi2/ >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlow...@linaro.org> > > Fixes?
Probably: Fixes: a4ccc37693a2 ("drm/msm/dsi_pll_10nm: restore VCO rate during restore_state") But CC stable would not be appropriate, since this was never reproduced on this PHY/hardware and we only guess a visible issue being fixed here. Best regards, Krzysztof