On Wed, 2025-06-04 at 15:16 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > Fair enough. Another alternative which saves the stack and macro would > be to add a new version of backlight_register_device which can pass the > integer number itself into dev_set_name, but thats probably not worth > the churn either. (Currently we snprintf into a buffer and then again > copy that again into the device name...)
If you really wanted to avoid stack space, you could add backlist_name[24] to 'struct nouveau_backlight'.
