On 6/12/25 6:04 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> On Mon Jun 9, 2025 at 7:24 PM BST, Rob Clark wrote:
>> If we have a newer dtb than kernel, we could end up in a situation where
>> the GPU device is present in the dtb, but not in the drivers device
>> table. We don't want this to prevent the display from probing. So
>> check that we recognize the GPU before adding the GPU component.
>>
>> v2: use %pOF
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robin.cl...@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> index 778e6ae7f137..0d12454b1f2e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> @@ -178,6 +178,26 @@ static int find_chipid(struct device_node *node,
>> uint32_t *chipid)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +bool adreno_has_gpu(struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + const struct adreno_info *info;
>> + uint32_t chip_id;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = find_chipid(node, &chip_id);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + info = adreno_info(chip_id);
>> + if (!info) {
>> + pr_warn("%pOF: Unknown GPU revision: %"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT"\n",
>> + node, ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(chip_id));
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void
>> *data)
>> {
>> static struct adreno_platform_config config = {};
>> @@ -188,18 +208,17 @@ static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct
>> device *master, void *data)
>> int ret;
>>
>> ret = find_chipid(dev->of_node, &config.chip_id);
>> - if (ret)
>> + /* We shouldn't have gotten this far if we can't parse the chip_id */
>> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
>> return ret;
>
> I just hit this with linux-next on qrb2210 RB1 [1].
>
> Is it expected an warning now or do we miss some device tree updates on
> linux-next for RB1?
>
> I don't recall seeing such warnings previously.
>
> Thanks,
> Alexey
>
> [1]:
>
> msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: bound 5e94000.dsi (ops dsi_ops [msm])
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 242 at drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c:224
> adreno_bind+0x90/0x120 [msm]
> Modules linked in: q6asm_dai q6routing q6afe_dai q6adm q6asm q6afe_clocks
> snd_q6dsp_common q6afe q6core apr pdr_interface qrtr_smd qcom_pd_mapper
> qcom_pdr_msg mcp251xfd ath10k_snoc snd_soc_wsa881x_i2c snd_soc_wsa881x_common
> can_dev lontium_lt9611uxc(+) ath10k_core ath mac80211 hci_uart btqca btbcm
> libarc4 msm snd_soc_sm8250 qrtr bluetooth drm_exec snd_soc_qcom_sdw
> qcom_q6v5_pas llcc_qcom snd_soc_qcom_common lmh qcom_wdt ocmem cfg80211
> ecdh_generic qcom_pil_info pinctrl_sm6115_lpass_lpi gpu_sched ecc
> drm_display_helper rfkill qcom_q6v5 pinctrl_lpass_lpi qcom_sysmon pwrseq_core
> lpasscc_sm6115 dispcc_qcm2290 qcom_common snd_soc_lpass_va_macro cec
> snd_soc_lpass_rx_macro drm_dp_aux_bus snd_soc_lpass_tx_macro qcom_glink_smem
> gpucc_qcm2290 snd_soc_pm4125 mdt_loader snd_soc_lpass_macro_common
> qmi_helpers snd_soc_pm4125_sdw soundwire_qcom regmap_sdw slimbus
> qcom_pmic_tcpm qcom_usb_vbus_regulator drm_client_lib tcpm rtc_pm8xxx
> snd_soc_wcd_mbhc aux_hpd_bridge qcom_pon qcrypto soundwire_bus sha256
> qcom_stats gpi
> spi_geni_qcom i2c_qcom_geni rpmsg_ctrl libsha256_generic libsha256
> rpmsg_char qcom_rng sha256_arm64 authenc icc_bwmon phy_qcom_qmp_usbc libdes
> typec phy_qcom_qusb2 display_connector i2c_gpio rmtfs_mem drm_kms_helper
> socinfo fuse drm backlight dm_mod ip_tables x_tables ipv6
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 242 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted
> 6.16.0-rc1-next-20250612-00025-g0ce0d3974333-dirty #2 PREEMPT
> Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Robotics RB1 (DT)
> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> pc : adreno_bind+0x90/0x120 [msm]
> lr : adreno_bind+0x50/0x120 [msm]
> sp : ffff8000813f3580
> x29: ffff8000813f3580 x28: ffff000008ae8800 x27: ffff000007c63700
> x26: ffffca4a2814b860 x25: ffff000008b26880 x24: ffffca4a24922000
> x23: ffffca4a249229d8 x22: ffff000009838800 x21: ffff000008b26880
> x20: ffff000002ce4410 x19: ffffca4a2495a710 x18: 0000000000000006
> x17: 6f5f697364207370 x16: 6f28206973642e30 x15: 0720072007200720
> x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0101010101010101
> x11: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x10: ffffca4a2866e1b2 x9 : 0000000000000002
> x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x6 : fefefeff2f383131
> x5 : ffff00007fc1b968 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 000000000000001e
> x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000007000200 x0 : ffffca4a2495a710
> Call trace:
> adreno_bind+0x90/0x120 [msm] (P)
> component_bind_all+0x100/0x23c
> msm_drm_bind+0x148/0x3e0 [msm]
> try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x16c/0x1e0
> __component_add+0xa4/0x174
> component_add+0x14/0x20
> dsi_dev_attach+0x20/0x34 [msm]
> dsi_host_attach+0x58/0x98 [msm]
> devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x34/0x90
> lt9611uxc_attach_dsi.isra.0+0x94/0x124 [lontium_lt9611uxc]
> lt9611uxc_probe+0x568/0x604 [lontium_lt9611uxc]
> i2c_device_probe+0x158/0x32c
> really_probe+0xbc/0x2b4
> __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x120
> driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x154
> __driver_attach+0x90/0x1a0
> bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb8
> driver_attach+0x24/0x30
> bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x208
> driver_register+0x68/0x124
> i2c_register_driver+0x48/0xcc
> lt9611uxc_driver_init+0x20/0x1000 [lontium_lt9611uxc]
> do_one_initcall+0x60/0x1d4
> do_init_module+0x54/0x23c
> load_module+0x1730/0x1cc0
> init_module_from_file+0x74/0xa0
> __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x130/0x2f8
> invoke_syscall+0x48/0x104
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0
> do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
> el0_svc+0x2c/0x80
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138
> el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> adreno 5900000.gpu: supply vdd not found, using dummy regulator
> adreno 5900000.gpu: supply vddcx not found, using dummy regulator
> msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: bound 5900000.gpu (ops a3xx_ops [msm])
> [drm:dpu_kms_hw_init:1173] dpu hardware revision:0x60050000
> dummy 1-0045: No cache used with register defaults set!
> [drm] Initialized msm 1.12.0 for 5e01000.display-controller on minor 0
> msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: [drm:adreno_request_fw [msm]] loaded
> qcom/a702_sqe.fw from new location
Looks like we should be doing this instead
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
index 5e7307567239..16e7ac444efd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct device
*master, void *data)
info = adreno_info(config.chip_id);
/* We shouldn't have gotten this far if we don't recognize the GPU: */
- if (!WARN_ON(info))
+ if (WARN_ON(!info))
return -ENXIO;
config.info = info;
Konrad
