On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:10:37 -0400 Yury Norov wrote: > I don't think that that having HWORD_UPDATE() in bitfield.h is a wrong > thing. Jakub, if you do, we can just create a new header for it.
Yes, I'd prefer to contain it. This looks very much like a CSR tooling convention of Rockchip's ASIC developers. IOW this is really about how CSRs are access for a specific vendor, not a generic bitfield operator.
