On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:51:44PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2025-06-21 at 14:29 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 02:07:40PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sat, 2025-06-21 at 11:40 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > Since commit 172efbb40333 ("AGP: Try unsupported AGP chipsets on x86-64 > > > > by > > > > default"), the AGP driver for AMD Opteron/Athlon64 CPUs attempts to bind > > > > to any PCI device. > > > > > > > > On modern CPUs exposing an AMD IOMMU, this results in a message with > > > > KERN_CRIT severity: > > > > > > > > pci 0000:00:00.2: Resources present before probing > > > > > > > > The driver used to bind only to devices exposing the AGP Capability, but > > > > that restriction was removed by commit 6fd024893911 ("amd64-agp: Probe > > > > unknown AGP devices the right way"). > > > > > > That didn't remove any restriction as the probe function still started > > > by checking for an AGP capability. The change I made was that the > > > driver would actually bind to devices with the AGP capability instead of > > > starting to use them without binding. > > > > The message above would not be emitted without your change. > > > > The check for the AGP capability in agp_amd64_probe() is too late > > to prevent the message. That's because the message is emitted > > before ->probe() is even called. > > I understand that. But I don't feel that the explanation above > accurately described the history here.
So please propose a more accurate explanation. Thanks, Lukas