On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 05:11:50PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

While merging this I adjusted the subject to be drm/i915

> > From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > 
> > An earlier patch fixed a build failure with clang, but I still see the
> > same problem with some configurations using gcc:
> > 
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c: In function 'config_mask':
> > include/linux/compiler_types.h:568:38: error: call to 
> > '__compiletime_assert_462' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON 
> > failed: bit > BITS_PER_TYPE(typeof_member(struct i915_pmu, enable)) - 1
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c:116:3: note: in expansion of macro 
> > 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
> >   116 |   BUILD_BUG_ON(bit >
> > 
> > As I understand it, the problem is that the function is not always fully
> > inlined, but the __builtin_constant_p() can still evaluate the argument
> > as being constant.
> > 
> > Marking it as __always_inline so far works for me in all configurations.
> > 
> > Fixes: a7137b1825b5 ("drm/i915/pmu: Fix build error with GCOV and AutoFDO 
> > enabled")

and to point to the original right patch instead of the cherry-picked fixes.

> > Fixes: a644fde77ff7 ("drm/i915/pmu: Change bitmask of enabled events to 
> > u32")

And then I pushed to drm-intel-gt-next becasue of the mention on this patch

> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > index 990bfaba3ce4..5bc696bfbb0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static unsigned int config_bit(const u64 config)
> >             return other_bit(config);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static u32 config_mask(const u64 config)
> > +static __always_inline u32 config_mask(const u64 config)
> 
> hmm, it looks like the __builtin_constant_p() with BUILD_BUG_ON is a bit 
> fragile
> design down here. But this always_inline will enforce deterministic behavior
> indeed.
> 
> So,
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> 
> pushing to drm-intel-next right now as well...
> 
> >  {
> >     unsigned int bit = config_bit(config);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.39.5
> > 

Reply via email to