On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:18:28 +0000 "Kasireddy, Vivek" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Cool, thanks, I'll paste that into the changelog ;) > > > > So if this code path is rare but expected and normal, should we be > > emitting this warning at all? > I think it would be OK to drop the warning. Otherwise, Syzbot would continue > to flag this issue. OK. Could you please propose such a patch? With a fairly detailed changelog explaining why the warning is bogus? After all, we don't want to be removing our ability to detect a real bug!
