On 04/07/2025 08:54, Sakari Ailus wrote: > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.pr...@arm.com> But this can't be merged via drm-misc until the PM changes have hit Linus' tree and been backmerged to drm-misc-next. Thanks, Steve > --- > The cover letter of the set can be found here > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>. > > In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last > busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on > rc2: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \ > pm-runtime-6.17-rc1 > > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_perfcnt.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_perfcnt.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_perfcnt.c > index 563f16bae543..0dd62e8b2fa7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_perfcnt.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_perfcnt.c > @@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ static int panfrost_perfcnt_disable_locked(struct > panfrost_device *pfdev, > panfrost_mmu_as_put(pfdev, perfcnt->mapping->mmu); > panfrost_gem_mapping_put(perfcnt->mapping); > perfcnt->mapping = NULL; > - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pfdev->dev); > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pfdev->dev); > > return 0; > @@ -279,7 +278,6 @@ void panfrost_perfcnt_close(struct drm_file *file_priv) > if (perfcnt->user == pfile) > panfrost_perfcnt_disable_locked(pfdev, file_priv); > mutex_unlock(&perfcnt->lock); > - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pfdev->dev); > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pfdev->dev); > } >
