Hi
Am 07.07.25 um 15:21 schrieb Christian König:
+#define DRM_FRAMEBUFFER_HAS_HANDLE_REF(_i) BIT(0u + (_i))
Why the "0u + (_i)" here? An macro trick?
You mean why not just BIT(_i)? internal_flags could possibly contain
additional flags. Just using BIT(_i) would make it look as if it's only
for those handle refs.
Best regards
Thomas
Regards,
Christian.
+
/**
* struct drm_framebuffer - frame buffer object
*
@@ -188,6 +191,10 @@ struct drm_framebuffer {
* DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS.
*/
int flags;
+ /**
+ * @internal_flags: Framebuffer flags like
DRM_FRAMEBUFFER_HAS_HANDLE_REF.
+ */
+ unsigned int internal_flags;
/**
* @filp_head: Placed on &drm_file.fbs, protected by &drm_file.fbs_lock.
*/
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)