On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:59:59PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg KH <greg at kroah.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:49:43PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: > >> From: Rob Clark <rob at ti.com> > >> > >> Update to reflect changes in: > >> "Make the per-driver file_operations struct const" > > > > This one I could take today, no need for me to rely on the drm api > > changes, right? > > I don't think so, at least not if you want it to compile ;-)
Doh, you are right, sorry about that. > Previously the 'struct file_operations' was inline with the 'struct > drm_driver' rather than a pointer. But if it it makes it easier for > you to keep track I can keep a tree that you can pull from w/ a branch > on top with the patches that depend on stuff coming in thru drm-next. No, that would mix the two branches, and I can't do that, right? So let's just wait for the drm-next branch to be merged with Linus, and I'll hold onto these until then, ok? thanks, greg k-h
